No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The United States and the United Nations Treaty on Racial Discrimination. A Report for the Panel on International Human Rights Law and Its Implementation. By Nathaniel L. Nathanson and Egon Schwelb. ASIL Studies in Transnational Legal Policy No. 9. (St. Paul: West Publishing Co., 1975. Pp. vii, 94. $3.)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Briefer Notices
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1976 by The American Society of International Law
References
1 The substance of the argumentation made to the White House urging the necessity of a U.S. signature to the Race Convention appears in Ferguson, , United Nations Convention Against Racial Discrimination: Civil Rights by Treaty, 1 Law in Transition 61 (1964)Google Scholar.
2 See, e.g., Remarks, Sen. Bricker (Rep. Ohio):
There are two reasons, Mr. Chairman, why Senate Joint Resolution has attracted such widespread support. The American people want to make certain that no treaty or executive agreement will be effective to deny or abridge their fundamental rights. Also, they do not want their basic rights to be supervised or controlled by international agencies over which they have no control.
Hearings on S.J.I and 43 Before the Subcomm. of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 83d. Cong., 1st Sess., 1 et seq. (1953).
3 217 P.2d. 481 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1950), aff’d. other grounds 38 Cal. 2d 718, 242 P.2d 617 (Cal. 1952).
4 Regarding UN Covenants on Human Rights, see, e.g., Ferguson, , United Nations Human Rights Covenants: Problems of Ratification and Implementation, 62 ASIL Proc. 83 (1968).Google Scholar