No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
U. S. Approach to the Non-proliferation Treaty Review Conference; Concerns About Korean and Iranian Nuclear Programs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005
References
1 Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, July 1, 1968, 21 UST 483, 729 UNTS 169 (entered into force Mar. 5, 1970).
2 [Editor’s Note: See Murphy, Sean D., Senate Consent to U.S. Ratification of IAEA Additional Protocol, 98 AJIL 608 (2004)Google Scholar.]
3 Bush, George W., Statement on the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 40 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc:. 383 (Mar. 7, 2005)Google Scholar.
4 Sanger, David E., Reshaping Nuclear Rules, N.Y. Times, Mar. 15, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar.
5 Id.; Sanger, David E., Threats Shadow New Conference on Nuclear Arms, N.Y. Times, May 1, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar. On one such measure, the Proliferation Security Initiative, see Byers, Michael, Policing the High Seas: The Proliferation Security Initiative, 98 AJIL 526 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 See Brooke, James & Sanger, David E., North Koreans Say They Hold Nuclear Arms, N.Y. Times, Feb. 11, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Kahn, Joseph & Sanger, David E., China Rules Out Using Sanctions on North Korea, N.Y. Times, May 11, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Brooke, James, North Koreans Claim to Extract Fuel for Bombs, N.Y. Times, May 11, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Sanger, David E., U.S. in Warning to North Korea on Nuclear Test, N.Y. Times, May 16, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar.
7 See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 270 (2005)Google Scholar.
8 At <http://www.un.int/usa/05_089.htm>; see Sanger, David E., U.S. Demand Deepens Gulf with Iran over Nuclear Facilities, N.Y. Times, May 3, 2005, at A4 Google Scholar.
9 See Sciolino, Elaine & Sanger, David E., Pressed, Iran Admits It Discussed Acquiring Tools for Nuclear Arms, N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Bernstein, Richard, Nuclear Agency Says Iran Has Blocked Investigations, N.Y. Times, Mar. 2, 2005 at A5 Google Scholar.
10 Linzer, Dafna, U.S. Urges Punishment for Iran Nuclear Work, Wash. Post, May 3, 2005, at A18 Google Scholar; Hoge, Warren & Sanger, David E., Iran to Resume Nuclear Plans, Official States, N.Y. Times, May 4, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Linzer, Dafna, Iran Says It Will Keep Its Nuclear Program, Wash. Post, May 4, 2005, at A16 Google Scholar; Linzer, Dafna, Iran Says Nuclear Plans on Hold, Wash. Post, May 5, 2005, at A22 Google Scholar; Iran Confirms Processing Tons of Uranium Ore, N.Y. Times, May 10, 2005, at A10 Google Scholar; Weisman, Steven R., Atom Agency May Be Asked to Meet on Iran Situation, N.Y. Times, May 12, 2005, at A12 Google Scholar; Linzer, Dafna, European Officials Issue Iran a Warning, Wash. Post, May 12, 2005, at A1 Google Scholar; Cowell, Alan, Britain Bach Penalties If Iran Restarts Nuclear Program, N.Y. Times, May 13, 2005, at A3 Google Scholar; Linzer, Dafna, Iran Leaves Door Open for Nuclear Discussion, Wash. Post, May 13, 2005, at A15 Google Scholar; MacFarquhar, Neil, Iran Parliament Calls for Resuming Nuclear Fuel Development, N.Y. Times, May 16, 2005, at A9 Google Scholar.
11 [Editor’s Note: See supra note 3 and accompanying text.]
12 The U.S. Approach to the Non-proliferation (NPT) Review Conference, at <http://www.state.gov/t7ac/rls/rm/45419.htm>.