Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T04:27:48.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To the Co-Editors in Cheif

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Robert F. Turner
Robert F. Turner*
Affiliation:
Universty of Frankfurt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I am writing in response to my friend Louis Fisher's piece (89 AJIL 21 (1995)) on the legality of President Truman's commitment of troops to hostilities in Korea without specific statutory authorization. He makes a persuasive case; however, I believe there is at least equally compelling evidence for a very different conclusion. My full response will soon appear elsewhere,1 but a few brief observations may be of interest to your readers.

Type
Correspondence
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 77 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1996 

References

1 Tentatively entitled “Truman, Korea, and the Constitution: Debunking the ‘Imperial President’ Myth,” the article is scheduled to appear in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy in early 1996.

2 S. Res. 167, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. (1987). In my view, the principle underlying this resolution is unsound. See Robert F. Turner, Beware the Tyranny of the Senate, Wall St. J., Feb. 22, 1988, at 20.