Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:08:28.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To the Co-Editors in Cheif

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Seymour J. Rubin
Seymour J. Rubin*
Affiliation:
Of the Board of Editors
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 89
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

References

1 It might also be noted here that, on August 23, 1996, the Inter-American Juridical Committee, in response to a request for an opinion by the OAS General Assembly, unanimously approved its Resolution CJI/RES.II-14/96, to which was annexed the committee’s opinion on the legality under international law of legislation “whose content is similar to diat of the Helms-Burton Act.” Focusing on the protection of property rights of nationals and the extraterritorial exercise of jurisdiction, the committee concluded that in diese “significant areas … the bases and potential application of the legislation … are not in conformity with international law.” OAS Doc. CJI/SO/II/doc.67/96, rev.5, at 6. The opinion is reprinted in 35 ILM 1322 (1996).