Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:19:07.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Third Circuit Requires Review in Diplomatic Assurances Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 353 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, opened for signature Dec. 10, 1984, 1465 UNTS 85.

2 Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2004).

3 Khouzam v. Hogan, 529 F.Supp.2d 543 (M.D. Pa. 2008); see Neela, Banerjee, Administration Is Rebuffed in a Ruling on Deportation, N.Y. Times, Jan. 11, 2008, at A17 Google Scholar.

4 Khouzam v. Att’y Gen., slip op. at 23 (3d Cir. Dec. 5, 2008), at <http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/072926p.pdf >.

5 Id. at 31.

6 Id. at 42.

7 Id. at 44.

8 Id. at 51.

9 Id. at 51–54 (citations omitted).

10 Id. at 56.

11 Id. at 56–57 (footnotes omitted).