No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tai Ping Insurance Co. v. M/V Warschau
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2017
Abstract
Keywords
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985
References
1 460 U.S. 1 (1983).
2 731 F.2d 1141, 1144, 1146.
3 Id. at 1145.
4 Id. at 1146 (quoting 460 U.S. at 20 (emphasis in original)). Cf. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Boeing-Vertol Co., 478 F.Supp. 84 (E.D. La.), aff’d per curiam, 606 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1979) (stay of arbitration affirmed).
5 Under this doctrine, where at least one of several causes of action falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, and it is “impracticable if not impossible” to separate it from the other causes of action, the entire dispute must remain within the jurisdiction of the court, despite the existence of an agreement to arbitrate. Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 720 F.2d 1446, 1448 (5th Cir. 1983). See also Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427 (1953).
6 731 F.2d at 1144, 1146.