No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 PCIJ, ser. A, No. 10 (Judgment of Sept. 7).
2 “[T]he first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that. . . it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State.” Id. at 18, quoted in the book under review at p. 159 n.43.
3 S.S. Lotus, 1927 PCIJ, ser. A, No. 10, at 23.
4 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. §§1330, 1602–1611 (1982).
5 The Schooner Exchange v. M’Faddon, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812).
6 Id. at 144.
7 See, e.g., de Vattel, E., The Law of Nations 3–8 (Fenwick, C. trans. 1916)Google Scholar.
8 Compare Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Revised) §403(3) (Tent. Draft No. 2, 1981) with id. §403(3) (Tent. Draft No. 7, 1986).