Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:17:24.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soviet Comments on International Law and International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

W. W. Kulski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1951 , pp. 556 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is an erroneous reference to ex-Secretary of State John W. Foster, who actually participated in the Japanese-Chinese peace negotiations. He was at that time an adviser to the Emperor of China.

2 This JOURNAL, Supp., Vol. 27 (1933), p. 193.

3 The Soviet authors had in mind Art. 6 of the Vth Hague Convention which states: “A neutral power does not incur responsibility from the fact that individuals cross its frontier singly in order to enlist in the service of the belligerents.” They seem to have forgotten Art. 4 of the same Convention: “No body of soldiers shall be organized or enlistment bureaus opened in the territory of a neutral power for the benefit of the belligerents.” (This JOURNAL, Supp., Vol. 2 (1908), pp. 119, 118.)