Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T07:11:28.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six Faces of Globalization: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why It Matters. By Anthea Roberts and Nicolas Lamp. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. vii, 391. Index.

Review products

Six Faces of Globalization: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why It Matters. By Anthea Roberts and Nicolas Lamp. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. vii, 391. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2023

Álvaro Santos
Álvaro Santos*
Affiliation:
Georgetown Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 117 , Issue 4 , October 2023 , pp. 756 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press for The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Branko Milanovic, Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (2016).

2 See, e.g., Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014).

3 See, e.g., Dani Rodrik, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (2011); Dani Rodrik, Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas For a Sane World Economy (2017).

4 See, e.g., Rethinking Capitalism (Michael Jacobs & Mariana Mazzucato eds., 2016).

5 See, e.g., World Trade and Investment Law Reimagined: A Progressive Agenda for an Inclusive Globalization (Alvaro Santos, Chantal Thomas & David Trubek eds., 2019).

6 See Stefan Becket (@becket), Twitter (Apr. 10, 2018, 7:18 PM), at https://twitter.com/becket/status/983846618263891968/photo/1.

7 See, e.g., Antony Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (2005).

8 For an effort to counter this conventional framing in international economic law, see Nicolás M. Perrone & Gregory Shaffer, Introduction to the Symposium on International Economic Law and Its Others, 116 AJIL Unbound 90, and, more generally, Anne Orford, A Jurisprudence of the Limit, in International Law and Its Others (Anne Orford ed., 2006).

9 WTO, Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, WTO Doc. WT/MIN(01)/Dec/2 (Nov. 20, 2001), at https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm.

10 See, e.g., Dani Rodrik, Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (1996); Joseph E. Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents (2003); Sassen, Saskia, Women's Burden: Counter-geographies of Globalization and the Feminization of Survival, 53 J. Int'l Aff. 503 (2000)Google Scholar.

11 See, e.g., Jagdish Bhagwati, In Defense of Globalization (2004); Martin Wolf, Why Globalization Works (2004).

12 Oxford Cartographers, The Peters Projection Map, at https://www.oxfordcartographers.com/our-maps/peters-projection-map.