Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:34:12.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should the United States Ratify the Covenants? A Question of Merits, Not of Constitutional Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Brunson MacChesney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 912 - 917
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

References

1 MacChesney, ‘ ‘ International Protection of Human Bights in the United Nations,'' 47 Northwestern U. Law Rev. 198(1952).

2 2 Int. Lawyer 600 (1967). Although labeled as an excerpt, the Editor-in-Chief of the International Lawyer stated that “the main thrust of the report remains unimpaired.“ Ibid, at 601.

3 Gardner, “A Costly Anachronism,” 53 A.B.A.J. 907 (1967).

4 2 Int. Lawyer 638(1967). Joint statement of Benjamin Busch, Walter B. Craig, Donald K. Duvall, Harry A. Inman, Robert Layton, Leonard C. Meeker, Charles E. Norberg and John E. Stevenson.

5 Ibid.

6 In the context of the Bricker Amendment, the writer has stated his views on the constitutional questions involved. See MacChesney, “The Fallacies in the Case for the Bricker Amendment,” 29 Notre Dame Lawyer 551(1954).

7 The debate is reported in 53 A.B.A.J. 963 at 972-976(1967).