Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:31:49.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sannon v. United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , July 1979 , pp. 508 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Meanwhile, in Pierre v. United States (547 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1977), vacated and remanded, 434 U.S. 962 (1977); 71 AJIL 534 (1977)) the same question had been presented. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, denying petitioner's application for habeas corpus, held that U.S. accession to the Protocol had not been intended to change the immigration laws concerning refugees and that any determination by the INS regarding a request for political asylum could only be reviewed on the grounds of abuse of discretion. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court, which it granted, vacating the judgment of the Fifth Circuit and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of the new INS procedures.

2 460 F.Supp. 458, 462.