Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:26:43.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resumption of U.S. Diplomatic Relations with the FRY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Sean D. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 387 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Smith, R. Jeffrey, Milosevic Foe Claims Victory, Wash. Post, Sept. 26, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar

2 See Erlanger, Steven, Yugoslavs Claim Belgrade for a New Leader, N.Y. Times, Oct. 6, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar

3 See Erlanger, Steven, Milosevic Concedes His Defeat; Yugoslavs Celebrate New Era, N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar

4 See 31 C.F.R. §§585.101-585.901 (2000). The continuing effect of these sanctions relates to assets in the United States held in the name of the former government of Yugoslavia, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

5 See Exec. Order No. 13,088, 3 C.F.R. 191 (1999); see also Exec. Order No. 13,121, 3 C.F.R. 176 (2000). For implementing regulations, see 31 C.F.R. §§586.101-586.901 (2000). By a general license, the government of the Republic of Montenegro was excluded from the effect of the sanctions, whereas the government of the Republic of Serbia was not.

6 Statement on Efforts to Lift Sanctions Against Serbia, 36 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 2447 (Oct. 16, 2000).Google Scholar

7 Exec. Order No. 13,192, 66 Fed. Reg. 7379 (2001); see Letter to Congressional Leaders on Lifting and Modifying Measures with Respect to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), 37 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 201 (Jan. 20, 2001)Google Scholar.

8 See Dobbs, Michael, Lifting Sanctions, U.S. Blacklists Milosevic Group, Wash. Post, Jan. 20, 2001, at A28.Google Scholar

9 See David, E. Sanger, Clinton to Scrap Belgrade Embargo on Oil and Travel, N.Y. Times, Oct. 12, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar

10 See Sean, D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 93 AJIL 628, 634-35 (1999)Google Scholar.

11 Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs, Fiscal Year 2001, Pub. L. No. 106-429, §594(a), (c), 114Stat. 1900,1900A-60 (2000); see Steven, A. Holmes, $100 Million Voted for Serbia, but with War-Crimes Strings, N.Y. Times, Oct. 26, 2000, at A16.Google Scholar

12 Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs, Fiscal Year 2001 §594(b).

13 See Daley, Suzanne, European Union Greets Yugoslav Government, N.Y. Times, Oct. 10, 2000, at A10.Google Scholar

14 See Drozdiak, William, EU Greets Kostunica with Aid as Transition Troubles Pmirf, Wash. Post, Oct. 15, 2000, at A31 Google Scholar; Smith, R. Jeffrey & Nakashima, Ellen, Serb Leader Hints at Milosevic Trial, Wash. Post, Oct. 13, 2000, at A24.Google Scholar

15 See Application of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for Admission to Membership in the United Nations, UN Doc. S/2000/1043 (2000).

16 See SC Res. 1326 (Oct. 31, 2000).

17 See GA Res. 55/12 (Nov. 1, 2000).

18 White House Press Release on Statement by the President (Nov. 18, 2000) (on file at GWU).

19 See Erlanger, Steven, U.S. Makes Arrest of Milosevic a Condition of Aid to Belgrade, N.Y. Times, Mar. 10, 2001, at A1.Google Scholar

20 See ICTY Press Release on Statement by the Prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte (Mar. 12, 2001), at <http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/p574-e.htm>; Erlanger, Steven, Bosnian Serb Surrenders to Hague Tribunal, N.Y. Times, Mar. 13, 2001, at A8.Google Scholar Simić was indicted for crimes against humanity and war crimes allegedly committed in Bosanski Šamac during 1992.

21 See ICTY Press Release on Milomir Stakić Transferred to the ICTY (Mar. 23, 2001), at <http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/p581e.htm>; Belgrade Sends Suspect to U.N. Tribunal, N.Y. Times, Mar. 24, 2001, at A7.Google Scholar Stakić was indicted for genocide allegedly committed in the municipality of Prijedor between April 1992 and January 1993.

22 See Gall, Carlotta, Security Forces in Belgrade Storm Milosevic’s House, N.Y. Times, Mar. 31, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar; Erlanger, Steven & Gall, Carlotta, Milosevic Arrest Came with Pledge for a Fair Trial, N.Y. Times, Apr. 2, 2001, at A1.Google Scholar

23 See U.S. Dep’t of State Press Release on Certification of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Apr. 2, 2001), at <http://www.state.gov>.