Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:03:57.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Renchard v. Humphreys & Harding, Inc. 381 F. Supp. 382

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Text of opinion provided by Craig S. Bamberger, Esq.

1 Renchard v. Humphreys & Harding, Inc., 59 F.R.D. 530 (D.D.C. 1973); 67 AJIL 789 (.1973). Renchard v. Humphreys & Harding, Inc., Civil Action No. 2128-72 (D.D.C. July 29, 1974); 69 AJIL 181 (1975).

2 381 F. Supp. 382, 383. Footnotes by court omitted.

3 Ibid., citing inter alia Victory Transport Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transporte, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 380 U.S. 929 (1965) [59 AJIL 388 (1965)] and Republic of Mexico v. Hoffman, 324 U.S. 30 (1945).

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid., 384.

6 Ibid.

7 Letter from Department of State to Ambassador of Brazil, January 30, 1974. Letter of Acting Legal Adviser, Jack, B. Tate, to Department of Justice, May 19, 1952 Google Scholar, 26 Dept. State Bull. 984 (1952).

8 381 F. Supp. 382, 385.