Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:14:59.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Red Sea Lights Agreement: Another Instance of International Cost-Sharing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

John M. Garner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 129 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Agreement for the Maintenance of Certain Lights in the Red Sea; done at London February 20, 1962; entered into force for the United States on October 28,1968; TIAS 6150; 17 UST 2145.

2 Latitude 14’05” N; Longitude 42’49” E.

3 Latitude 15’33” N; Longitude 41’50” E.

4 28 LNTS 23.

5 Protocol Terminating the Convention of May 31, 1865 (14 Stat 679; T.S. 245) concerning the Cape Spartel Lighthouse, and Transferring the Control, Operation and Administration of the Lighthouse to the Government of Morocco; signed at Tangier March 31, 1958; entered into force for the United States March 31, 1958; TIAS 4029; 9 UST 527. Stuart, G. H. The International Lighthouse at Cape Spartel, 24 AJIL 770 (1930)Google Scholar.

6 Agreement Regarding Financial Support of the North Atlantic Ice Patrol; opened for signature at Washington January 4, 1956; entered into force for the United States July 5, 1956; TIAS 3597; 7 UST 1969.

7 S. Exec. F, 88th Cong., 1st Sess., May 8, 1963; and Senate Comm. on Foreign Relations, 88th Cong., 2nd Sess., Exec. Reft. No. 5, Feb. 21, 1964.

8 United States Contributions to International Organizations, 21st Ann. Rep. H. R. Doc. No. 93–195, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess., 1973, at 63 (and reports for previous years); Dept. of State Airgram, unclassified, London A-651 dated Aug. 7, 1974; with enclosure from Foreign and Commonwealth Office dated Aug. 1, 1974.

9 Dept. of State Airgram, unclassified, London A-32 dated Jan. 8, 1973; with enclosure from the Department of Trade and Industry dated Jan. 4, 1973.

10 Dept. of State Airgram, unclassified, London A-1390 of Nov. 26, 1973, with enclosure from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office dated Nov. 13, 1973.

11 70 Dept. State Bull. 385 (1974) U.S. to Assist in Sweeping Mines from Suez Canal Waters; see also Hearings on The United States Role in Opening the Suez Canal Before the Subcomm. on the Near East and Asia of the House Coram, on Foreign Affairs, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess. (1974).

12 See Garner, John M. The Reopening of Suez: Who Gains? Who Loses? 100 U.S. Naval Institute Phoc. 103 (1974)Google Scholar.