Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:23:25.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re “The Arab Oil Weapon”: A Skeptic's View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Stephen N. Smith*
Affiliation:
Stephen F. Austin State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1975

References

1 See 68 AJIL 410 (1974).

2 The authors employ numerous terms to describe the Arab action, and finally maintain at 412 that no existing legal concept is adequate in light of the “coercive process” under consideration.

3 See supra note 1, at 413.

4 See supra note 1, at 417–18.

5 See supra note 1, at 419.

6 See UN GA Res. 2625, Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 25 UN GAOR, Supp. 18, at 122–24, UN Doc. A/8028 (1970).

7 See supra, note 1, at 417.

8 See supra note 1, at 421.

9 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964); Sei Fujii v. The State of California, 217 P.R. 2d 481 (1950).

10 See supra note 1, at 418.

* Correspondence on this matter is now closed. R.R.B.