Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T00:32:27.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. By Jo M. Pasqualucci. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xlvii, 388. Index. $140, £100, cloth; $65, £38, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Douglass Cassel*
Affiliation:
Notre Dame Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nov. 22, 1969, OAS TS No. 36, 1144 UNTS 123 (entered into force July 18, 1978).

2 American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, May 2, 1948, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.23, doc. 21 rev. 6.

3 Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 4 (1988). All judgments and advisory opinions of the Inter-American Court are available on the Court’s web site, <http://www.corteidh.or.cr>.

4 E.g., Plan de Sánchez Massacre v. Guatemala, Inter- Am. Ct. H.R. (Sen C) No. 105 (2004).

5 E.g., Gómez-Paquiyauri Bros. v. Peru, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 110 (2004).

6 E.g., “The Last Temptation of Christ” v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 73 (2001).

7 E.g., Baena Ricardo v. Panama, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 72 (2001).

8 E.g., Cantos v. Argentina, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 97 (2002).

9 Juridical Condition and Rights of the Undocumented Migrants, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) No. 18, paras. 70-110(2003).

10 Id., paras. 111-73.

11 Habeas Corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts. 27(2), 25(1) and 7(6) American Convention on Human Rights), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) No. 8 (1987); Judicial Guarantees in States of Emergency (Arts. 27(2), 25 and (8) American Convention on Human Rights), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) No. 9 (1987).

12 The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of the Due Process of Law, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) No. 16 (1999).

13 Constitutional Court v. Peru, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 71 (2001). This judgment and Ivcher Bronstein, infra note 14, are discussed in Karen C. Sokol, Case Report: Ivcher Bronstein & Constitutional Tribunal, 95 AJIL 178 (2001).

14 Ivcher Bronstein v. Peru, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 74 (2001).

15 Barrios Altos v. Peru, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) No. 75 (2001).

16 Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, “Simón, Julio Héctor y otros s/privación ilegítima de la libertad, etc.—causa N° 17.768” (June 14, 2005) (Arg.), at <http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/arg/doc/nulidad.html>.

17 Readers fluent in Spanish might also consult the latest edition of the excellent treatise by Héctor Faúndez Ledesma, El Sistema Interamericano De Protección De Los Derechos Humanos: Aspectosinstitucionales Y Procesales (3rd ed. 2004)

18 Buergenthal, Thomas, The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights, in Human Rights in International Law: Legal And Policy Issues 439, 470 (Meron, Theodor ed., 1984)Google Scholar.

19 The African Union recently decided to merge that Court with the new African Union Court of Justice. Assembly of the African Union, Decision No. Assembly/AU/Dec.83 (V) (2005), at <http://www.africa-union. org/root/au/Documents/Decisions/hog/Decisions_Sirte_July_2005.pdf>.