Article contents
Plaintiff M68/2015 v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- International Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016
References
1 Plaintiff M68/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] HCA 1 (Austl.) (Feb. 3, 2016), at http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_m68-2015.
2 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, July 28, 1951, 189 UNTS 137, as amended by Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, Jan. 31, 1967, 606 UNTS 267.
3 Australia, Nauru, and Papua New Guinea are all parties to the Refugee Convention and Protocol, supra note 2.
4 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 1.
5 The Migration Amendment (Regional Processing Arrangements) Act 2015 (Cth) sch 1 amended Australia’s Migration Act 1958 with retrospective effect to August 18, 2012.
6 Moti v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 456.
7 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, supra note 4.
8 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Dec. 10, 1984, S. Treaty Doc. No. 20-100 (1988), 1465 UNTS 85.
9 Namah v. Pato, (2016) SC 1497, at https://uploads.guim.co.uk/2016/04/26/PNG_SC_judgement.pdf.
10 See generally Goldenziel, Jill I., When Law Migrates: Refugees in Comparative International Law, in Comparative International Law (Roberts, Anthea, Stephan, Paul B., Verdier, Pierre-Hugues, & Versteeg, Mila eds., forthcoming 2017)Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by