Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:13:48.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plaintiff M68/2015 v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jill I. Goldenziel*
Affiliation:
Marine Corps University, Command and Staff College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Plaintiff M68/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] HCA 1 (Austl.) (Feb. 3, 2016), at http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_m68-2015.

2 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, July 28, 1951, 189 UNTS 137, as amended by Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, Jan. 31, 1967, 606 UNTS 267.

3 Australia, Nauru, and Papua New Guinea are all parties to the Refugee Convention and Protocol, supra note 2.

4 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 1.

5 The Migration Amendment (Regional Processing Arrangements) Act 2015 (Cth) sch 1 amended Australia’s Migration Act 1958 with retrospective effect to August 18, 2012.

6 Moti v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 456.

7 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, supra note 4.

8 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Dec. 10, 1984, S. Treaty Doc. No. 20-100 (1988), 1465 UNTS 85.

10 See generally Goldenziel, Jill I., When Law Migrates: Refugees in Comparative International Law, in Comparative International Law (Roberts, Anthea, Stephan, Paul B., Verdier, Pierre-Hugues, & Versteeg, Mila eds., forthcoming 2017)Google Scholar.