Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:41:04.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pashukanis is no Traitor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

John N. Hazard
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 1957 , pp. 385 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1957

References

1 For a record of the denunciation and the texts of the principal works of Pashukanis and his denouncers, see Lenin, V. I. et at., Soviet Legal Philosophy (20th Century Legal Philosophy Series, 1951)Google Scholar.

2 “For an authoritative scientific reworking of the root questions of the science of the history of the Soviet state and law” (in Russian), Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, No. 6 (1956), p. 3 at p. 10.

3 Pashukanis, E., Ocherki po Mezhdunarodnomu Pravu [Essays in International Law] (Moscow, 1935)Google Scholar.

4 Idem at 16.

5 For a more detailed analysis of Pashukanis’ position, see Kelsen, The Communist Theory of Law 152–156 (1955).

6 Kulski, , “The Soviet Interpretation of International Law,” 49 A.J.I.L. 518 (1955)Google Scholar.