Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:53:43.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Palestine Commission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Yuen-li Liang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes on Legal Questions Concerning the United Nations
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 1948 , pp. 649 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 UN Doc. A/286, 3 April 1947.

2 Australia, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, India, Iran, Netherlands, Peru, Sweden, Uruguay and Yugoslavia.

3 UN Doc. A/309, 23 May 1947.

4 Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, Netherlands, Sweden, Peru and Uruguay.

5 UN Doc. A/364, 3 September 1947.

6 For the viewpoint of the Arab States, see in particular the report of Sub-Committee II of the Ad Hoc Committee on Palestine, Chapter 1, entitled “Legal Issues Connected with the Palestine Problem,” UN Doc. A/AC.H/32, pp. 5–24, 11 November 1947.

7 UN Doc. A/AC.14/32, p. 15, 11 November 1947. For other proposals to request the Court for advisory opinions concerning Palestine questions see UN Docs. A/AC.14/21, 14 October 1947; A/AC.14/24, 16 October 1947; and A/AC.14/25, 16 October 1947.

8 Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen.

9 Argentina, Chile, China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.

10 UN Doc. A/364, 3 September 1947.

11 For the full text of these statements, see UN Doe. A/P.V. 128, pp. 91–101, 29 November 1947.

12 General Assembly Eesolution 181 (II) , 29 November 1947, Plan of Partition with Economic Union, Part I B 2 and 14.

13 Same, Part I B 14.

14 General Assembly Resolution 181 (II) , 29 November 1947, Part A (a), (b), and (c).

15 UN Doc. 8/663, 31 January 1948.

16 UN Doc. S/676, 16 February 1948.

17 UN Doc. S/P.V. 253, pp. 29–30, 24 February 1948.

18 Same, at pp. 53–55.

19 Same, at pp. 47–48.

20 Same, at p. 32.

21 UN Doc. S/P.V. 254, pp. 2–45, 24 February 1948.

22 UN Doc. S/P.V. 258, pp. 2–35, 27 February 1948.

23 UN Doc. A/AC.21/13, 9 February 1948. See S/P.V. 265, 10 March 1948.

24 UN Doc. A/AC.21/13, p. 7, 9 February 1948.

25 Same at 11.

26 UN Doc. S/691, 5 March 1948.

27 UN Doc. S/695, 15 March 1948.

28 See UN Doc 8/P.V. 271, pp. 11–35, 19 March 1948.

29 Same, at 41.

30 UN Doc. S/P.V. 271, pp. 44–50, 19 March 1948.

31 UN Doc. S/P.V. 274, 24 March 1948.

32 UN Doc. 8/714, 7 April 1948.

33 See Report of First Committee to the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/522, 14 May 1948.

34 UN Doc. A/544. See A/P. v. 135, 14 May 1948. at this writing it is too late to include a discussion of the legal problems arising in the Security Council subsequent to the closure of the Special Session of the General Assembly on 14 May 1948.