Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:12:15.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Covey Oliver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 1962 , pp. 213 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See also U. S. ex rel D ‘Amico v. Bishopp, 286 F. 2d 320 (U. S. Ct. A., 2d Cir., Jan. 23, 1961), reported in 55 A.J.I.L. 746 (1961).

2 81 S. Ct. 798, 803 (1961).

3 A few cases of possible current interest are herewith reported prior to their printing in the advance sheets. U. S. Law Week ordinarily prints excerpts taken from mimeograph copies of opinions as first delivered in court. Occasionally judges make modifications in their opinions after delivery but before printing in the advance sheets of the National Reporting System. Nonetheless, delays now noticed in advance sheet prints, coupled with the long lag between the Editor’s deadline and the printing of the Journal, suggest need for an occasional report based on sources less than entirely complete and entirely final.