Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:44:14.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nicaragua Case: A Response to Paul Reichler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen M. Schwebel
Stephen M. Schwebel*
Affiliation:
Of the Board of Editors
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 582 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Editorial Comment: Celebrating a Fraud on the Court, 106 AJIL 102 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 ICJ Rep. 14, Diss. Op. Schwebel, J., paras. 24-32, factual appendix, paras. 16-224 (June 27).

3 Cf. Reichler, Paul S., The Nicaragua Case: A Response to Judge Schwebel, 106 AJIL 316 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (paraphrasing editorial’s “central thesis”).

4 ICJ Pleadings (5 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua) 31.

5 Id. at 102.

6 Id. at 142, 145.

7 Id. at 140-46.

8 Id. at 146.

9 Id. at 430.

10 Id. at 123; Diss. Op. Schwebel, J., supra note 2, passim.

11 1986 ICJ Rep., para. 160.