Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:41:35.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Messrs. Kushen and Harris reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 92
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Glucksman v. Henkel, 221 U.S. 508 (1911); Neely v. Henkel, 180 U.S. 109 (1901).

2 See, e.g., Ahmad v. Wigen, 910 F.2d 1063, 1067 (2d Cir. 1990).

3 Ahmad, 910 F.2d at 1067; Sindona v. Grant, 619 F.2d 167, 174 n.10 (2d Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 912 (1981).

4 Pub. L. No. 104-192, 110 Stat. 2104 (1996).

5 H.R. Rep. No . 698, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. 6-7 (1996).