Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T17:18:22.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lowry v. Reagan. 676 F. Supp. 333

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 596 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 50 U.S.C. §1543(a)(1)(1982).

2 The court refused to consider the standing issue. 676 F.Supp. 333, 337 n.26. Moreover, the court concluded that if it had decided to exercise jurisdiction, “the availability of constitutional review indicates that the apparent absence of a private right of action is not fatal to this Court’s equitable disposition of this case.” Id. at 339.

3 Id. at 337.

4 Id. at 339.

5 Id. at 340 (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962)).

6 Id. at 339.

7 Id. at 341.