Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:36:33.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Status of South-West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 1950 , pp. 757 - 770
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Excerpted text of opinion.

† Caption by the Court.

1 Judges McNair and Bead wrote separate opinions concurring on the remaining points but dissenting from the portion relating to the exercise of supervisory functions by, and making of reports to, the United Nations.

2 Judges Alvarez, DeVisscher, Krylov, Zoričić, Badawi Pasha, and Vice Pres. Guerrero. The first three wrote dissenting opinions, and the others declared their inability to concur in the opinion that the Charter imposed no legal obligation on South Africa to place the Territory under the Trusteeship System, sharing in general in the views expressed by Judge DeVisscher instead.