Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:59:54.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Law and the Role of Domestic Legal Systems. By Benedetto Conforti. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993. Pp. xxii, 201. Index. Dfl.1135; $82.50; L54.000.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Harold G. Maier*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 212 Recueil des Cours (1988 V).

2 Cf. Harold G. Maier, The Principles of Sovereignty, Sovereign Equality, and National Self-Determination, in International Law and International Security: Military and Political Dimensions 241, 243 (P. B. Stephan III & B. M. Klimenko eds., 1991).

3 Cf. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991).

4 Article 38(2) of the Statute of the ICJ gives opinions of scholars and judicial opinions equal status as secondary sources of international law.

5 Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States 392–93 (1988) [hereinafter Restatement III].

6 Letter from Acting Legal Adviser Jack B. Tate to Dep’t of Justice (May 19, 1952), 26 Dep’t St. Bull. 984 (1952).

7 See National City Bank v. Republic of China, 348 U.S. 356 (1955); Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 381 U.S. 934 (1965). For a description of the role of the executive branch in sovereign immunity cases before the passage of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, see Harold G. Maier, The Proposed Sovereign Immunities Act: Its Effect on Judicial Deference, 70 ASIL Proc. 48 (1976); Harold G. Maier & E. E. Cheatham, Private International Law and Its Sources, 22 Vand. L. Rev. 27, 36–37, 83–87 (1968); Harold G. Maier, Sovereign Immunity and Act of State: Correlative or Conflicting Policies?, 35 U. Cin. L. Rev. 556 (1966).

8 The author’s misunderstanding may have resulted from a misreading of the Restatement’s description of efforts by the bar and the State Department to encourage the passage of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976. See Restatement III, supra note 5, at 393.

9 Id. §442, comment a.

10 W.S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp. Int’l, 493 U.S. 400 (1990).