No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
International Criminal Law
U.S. Department of State Legal Adviser’s Views on International Criminal Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2013
References
1 Harold Hongju Koh, Justice Address 2012 at the Vera Institute of Justice: International Criminal Justice 5.0 (Nov. 8, 2012), and Keynote Lecture at the Grotius Centre, Leiden University: International Criminal Justice 5.0 (Nov. 15, 2012), available at http://www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/200957.htm.
2 Id.
3 International Law Commission, Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, [1950] 2 Y.B. Int’l L. Comm’n 374, UN Doc. A/CN.4./Ser.A.1950/Add.1, available at http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_1950_v2_e.pdf.
4 Koh, supra note 1.
5 Koh, supra note 1.
6 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 101 AJIL 636, 647 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.]
7 Koh, supra note 1.
8 On U.S. support for the SCSL, see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 105 AJIL 122, 150 (2011)Google Scholar.
9 Koh, supra note 1.
10 see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 106 AJIL 643, 685 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Koh, supra note 1.
12 see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 271, 272 (2010) & 106 AJIL 360, 384 (2012)Google Scholar.
13 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 101 AJIL 185, 213 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.]
14 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 100 AJIL 455, 477 (2006)Google Scholar.]
15 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 691, 691 (2005) & 101 AJIL 636, 636 (2007)Google Scholar.]
16 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 103 AJIL 132, 152 (2009)Google Scholar.]
17 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 100, 126 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.]
18 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 489, 511 (2010)Google Scholar.]
19 [Editor’s note: SC Res. 1970 (Feb. 26, 2011).]
20 [Editor’s note: see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 106 AJIL 138, 168 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.]
21 Koh, supra note 1.
22 [Editor’s note: see Crook, supra note 18, at 511.]
23 Koh, supra note 1.
24 Id.
25 Id.
26 see Crook, supra note 10, at 650, 652.
27 Koh, supra note 1.