Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:00:10.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institut de Droit International: Session of Zagreb, 1971

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Herbert W. Briggs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 352 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 From the United States, Philip Jessup, Myres McDougal, Willis Reese, Oscar Schachter and the writer were in attendance. United States membership has declined with the resignations of Elliott Cheatham, Green Hackworth and Josef Kunz, and the death of Quincy Wright. There is a wealth of international law talent in the United States but the current tendency in the Institut is against electing two candidates from the same country at the same session.

2 Below, pp. 465–470. The Institut also adopted two resolutions on matters of private international law which are not discussed in this note: Le contrat de commission de transport en droit international privé (Léon Babinski, Rapporteur) and Les conflits de lois en matière de droit du travail (Etienne Szászy, Rapporteur).

3 Cf. 45 Annuaire de 1’Institut de Droit International, Session d’Aix-en-Provence, 1954 (I) 555–558, Report by Frederic R. Coudert, J. P. A. François and H. Lauterpacht (Nov. 30, 1953); ibid. (II) 400.

4 47 ibid., Session d’Amsterdam, 1957 (I) 323–606.

5 Ibid. 328–335, 370 ff., 498–505.

6 48 ibid., Session de Neuchâtel, 1959 (II) 178–263, 367, 389; see 54 A.J.I.L. 133, 139(1960).

7 50 ibid., Session de Bruxelles, 1963 (I) 5–127; ibid. (II) 306–356, 368, 376. See also 58 A.J.I.L. 116–117 (1964).

8 50 Annuaire, Session de Bruxelles (II) 345. Cf. François, Résumé de 1’ historique de la question, 51 ibid., Session de Varsovie, 1965 (I) 353–356.

9 52 ibid., Session de Nice, 1967 (II) 1–271, 527–533.

10 53 ibid., Session d’Edimbourg, 1969 (II) 48–126, 358–360, 375–377.

11 Ibid. 377. See below, p. 470.

12 Institut de Droit International, Première Commission, Paul De Visscher, Les conditions d’application des lois de la guerre aux opérations militaires des Nations Unies, pp. 1–226 (Geneva, July 15, 1971). The reports will be published in Vol. 54 of the Annuaire.

13 See below, p. 465.

14 The distinction was denied by some members, who regarded all rules of the laws of war as humanitarian in purpose.

15 See below, p. 468, for the text. Cf. Institut de Droit International, Eighteenth Commission, Hijacking of Aircraft, Edward McWhinney: Provisional Report, Geneva, Oct. 1970, 151 pp.; Final Report, May, 1971, 101 pp. These reports will be published in Vol. 54 of the Annuaire.

16 Cf. Art. IV of Institut resolution, below, p. 470. For the text of the Aviation Sabotage Convention adopted at Montreal, Sept. 23, 1971, see 65 Department of State Bulletin 465–468 (1971); also reprinted below, p. 455. For text of Convention on Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, see 65 A.J.I.L 440 (1971).

17 Cf. the trenchant comments of Prof. J. H. W. Verzijl in his letter of Jan. 31, 1971, to the Rapporteur, McWhinney, Final Report, cited, pp. 52–59.

18 Art. II, below, p. 469. The Institut resolution was adopted by a vote of 53–0–3.