Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-jr95t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T05:39:04.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In re Braier’s Estate. 111 N. E. (2d) 424

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 506 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The court pointed out that though the treaty terminated July 5, 1952, it had proceeded on the assumption that the provisions were controlling, since it was in force at the time of the Surrogate’s decision, citing Santovicenzo v. Egan, 284 U. S. 30, 36 (1931).

3 I.e., supplied by the court.