Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T14:06:48.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Icy Day at the ICJ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comments
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 U.S. Dep’t of State, Statement: U.S. Withdrawal from the Proceedings Initiated by Nicaragua in the International Court of Justice, undated, at 1 (mimeo.).

2 Id. at 3.

3 Id. at 2.

4 Id.

5 Id. at 4.

6 Lecture by Allan Gerson, “Should the U.S. Rethink its Attitude toward the World Court? Implications of the Dispute with Nicaragua on American Foreign Policy,” John Bassett Moore Society of International Law, University of Virginia School of Law (Nov. 17, 1984, mimeo.).

7 79 Cong. Rec. 702 (1935).

8 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 1984 ICJ Rep. 392, 403-08 (Judgment of Nov. 26).

9 Id. at 408-10.

10 Id. at 569-94.

11 Id. at 414-15.

12 Id. at 415-21.

13 Id. at 427-29.

14 Id. at 631-37.

15 Id. at 432-41.