Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:58:53.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Act of state doctrineantitrust suitLibyan oil expropriation
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 780 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The seven defendants were Mobil Oil Corp., Exxon Corp., Shell Petroleum Corp., Ltd., Texaco, Inc., Standard Oil Co. of California, The British Petroleum Co., Ltd., and Gulf Oil Corp. (footnote by Court; other footnotes by Court omitted).

2 Citing American Banana v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347 (1909) as distinguished inUnited States v. Sisal Sales Corp., 274 U.S. 268 (1927).

3 550 F.2d 68, 76.

4 Citing A. Rovine, Digest Of United States Practice In International Law 1973, at 335.

5 550 F.2d 68, 78.

6 Id.

7 Id.79.

8 Id.80.