Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:56:15.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The French Spoliation Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

George A. King
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From time to time the cases known by the generic name of French Spoliation Claims come up for discussion in Congress and in the press and are often debated without any very definite conception of their origin or basis. It may seem strange that claims against the government whose inception is connected with the very beginning of our national existence should still be the subject of consideration as present demands against the government, both before the courts and in the legislative forum.

But dilatoriness in dealing with matters of private right between the citizen and the government seems to have become traditional. Not until 1885 was there any tribunal before which these claims could be prosecuted. Even under the Act of 1885, as will be seen hereafter, a decision of the court has not the legal effect of a final judgment. Hence, it is that the liability of the government for the payment of these claims settled by unanimous judicial decision a quarter of a century ago is often reopened in Congress and the press and the subject threshed out anew, often in apparent ignorance of the laborious investigation long since made by the Court of Claims into the history and basis of these claims, and the result of that investigation as announced in a number of thorough and well-reasoned opinions.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1912 , pp. 359 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, pp. 202, 203.

2 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, p. 214.

3 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, p. 215.

4 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, article 17, pp. 208, 209.

5 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, article XXV, p. 280.

6 1 Statutes at Large, 561.

7 1 Statutes at Large, 565.

8 1 Statutes at Large, 572.

9 1 Statutes at Large, 678.

10 1 Statutee at Large, 678.

11 April 30, 1798, 1 Statutes at Large, 653.

12 Act May 28, 1798, sec. 5, 1 Statutes at Large, 668.

13 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, p. 225.

14 Public Treaties of the United States, 1875, p. 232.

15 Clayton’s Speech, 1846.

16 23 Statutes at Large, 283.

17 10 Statutes at Large, 612.

18 12 Statutes at Large, 767.

19 United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128, 144.

20 United States v. Borcherling, 185 U. S. 223, 234.

21 Judicial Code, Secs. 242, 243.

22 United States v. O’Qrady, 22 Wall. 641, 648.

23 Compilation of Reports of Committee on Foreign Relations, U. S. Senate, Vol. I, pp. 305, 306.

24 Compilation of Reports of Committee on Foreign Relations, U. S. Senate, Vol. I. p. 306.

25 Ship Concord, 35 C. Cls. 432, 443, 444.

26 De Bode v. The Queen, 3 Clarke’s House of Lords, p. 464.

27 Gray, Adm’r v. United States, 21 C. Cls. 340, 391.

28 “La brochure dont nous nous occupons renferme les avis donnés par la cour des griefs, et il est presque inutile de dire que ces avis sont favorables aux plaignants.”

29 “Espérons que le congrès se ralliera à l’avis qui lui est donné, et terminera ainsi une controverse qui offre de l’intérêt plus à cause do son origine et de ea durée extraordinaire qu’a cause des difficultés qu’elle présente.”

30 Brigs Fanny and Hope, 46 C. Cla. 214, 223, 224.

31 Senator Sumner’s report on French spoliation claims, Compilation of Reports of Committee on Foreign Relations, U. S. Senate, Vol. I, p. 319.