Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:27:58.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom to Withdraw Diplomatic Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Charles Cheney Hyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1936 , pp. 284 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 League of Nations Doc. No. C.40.M.18.1936.VII.

2 Id.

3 League of Nations Doc. No. C.11.M.10.1936.VII.

According to a paraphrase of the Uruguayan communication contained in the Monthly Summary of the League of Nations, January, 1936, p. 9: The Uruguayan Government stated that "the Government had decided to suspend diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union. Owing to serious disturbances that had recently occurred in Brazil, the Government of that country had informed the Uruguayan Foreign Minister that the Soviet Government, through its Legation in Montevideo, had given support to Communist elements in Brazil. Moreover, at the Congress of the Third International, held in Moscow in July, 1935, several speakers had expressed their sympathy for M. Prestes, Head of the Brazilian revolutionary movement. No distinction could be made between the Third International and the Soviet Government. Moreover, according to information obtained by the Uruguayan Government, the Soviet Legation in Montevideo had issued bearer cheques for large sums and for objects that could not be determined, although there was strong reason to believe that these sums had served to support the revolutionary movement in Brazil.”

4 Minutes of the Council, Jan. 23, 1936, at 10:30 a.m. .

5 Id. Both Messrs. Guani and Litvinoff discussed the matter at the meeting of the Council, Jan. 23, 1936, at 3:30 p.m.

6 Minutes of the Council, Jan. 23, 1936, at 3:30 p.m.

7 Minutes of the Council, Jan. 24, 1936, at 4 p.m. The President of the Council, Mr. Bruce of Australia, made the suggestion that led to the invocation of the aid of M. Titulesco and his two colleagues.

8 Minutes of the Council, Jan. 23, 1936, at 3:30 p.m.

9 League of Nations Doc. No. C.78.M.26.1936.VII. See, also, communication from M. Monteiro, the representative of Portugal, addressed to the Secretary General, Feb. 19, 1936, League of Nations Doc. No. C.101.M.42.1936.VII.

10 See Mr. Knox, Secy, of State, to the Nicaraguan Chargé d’Affaires, Dec. 1, 1909, For. Bel. 1909, 455.

11 Minutes of the Council, Jan. 24, 1936, at 4 p.m.