Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:10:13.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1952 , pp. 348 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Excerpted text of opinion.

2 Pres. Basdevant; Vice-Pres. Guerrero; Judges Alvarez, Hackworth, Winiarski, Zoričić, DeVisscher, McNair, Klaestad, Badawi Pasha, Read, Hsu Mo.

3 Caption by the Court.

4 Judge Hackworth declared that he concurred in the operative part of the judgment, but emphasized that he did so because he considered that Norway had proved the existence of a historic title to the disputed areas. Judges Alvarez and Hsu Mo gave separate opinions, the latter finding that certain of the base-lines were not fixed in accordance with international law. Judges McNair and Bead gave dissenting opinions.