Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:19:52.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of a State Department Declaration of Foreign Policy upon Private Litigation—The Netherlands Vesting Orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Arthur K. Kuhn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 1942 , pp. 651 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Anderson v. N. V. Transandine Handelmaatschappij et al. The State of The Netherlands, Intervener. Law Report News, July 31, 1942, p. 3; this Journal, infra, p. 701.

2 Vladikavkazsky Ry. v. New York Trust Co. (1934), 263 N. Y. 371, at p. 378.

3 See Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. (1934), 266 N. Y. 71, at p. 106.

4 (1942) 315 U. S. 203; this Journal , April, 1942, Vol. 36, p. 309.Google ScholarPubMed See the dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Stone, ibid., p. 329, and editorial comments by Borchard and Jessup,ibid., pp. 275–288

5 Story, Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, § 32.

6 B. N. Cardozo, The Paradoxes of Legal Science, p. 10.