Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:50:32.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Custom Have A Source?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Customary international law often seems like a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. According to Manley O. Hudson, even the drafters of the International Court of Justice Statute “had no very clear idea as to what constituted international custom.” The situation has not changed much since then.

I got my first taste of the difficulties in identifying custom when I was a junior attorney at the U.S. Department of State and was assigned the task of preparing the U.S. submission in a juvenile death penalty case before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The juvenile death penalty is prohibited by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the American Convention on Human Rights, but the question in the Inter-American Commission case was whether it is also prohibited as a matter of customary international law.

Type
Symposium: Reflections on Customary International Law and the International Law Commission’s Project
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

References

1 Daniel, Bodansky, Prologue to a Theory of Non-Treaty Norms, in Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Arsanjani, Mahnoush et al. eds., 2010)Google Scholar.

2 Cohen, Harlan Grant, Finding International Law: Rethinking the Doctrine of Sources, 93 Iowa L. Rev. 65 (2007)Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Walden, Raphael M., Customary International Law: A Jurisprudential Analysis, 13 ISR. L. Rev. 86, 91 (1978)Google Scholar.