Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:15:55.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic Legitimacy as a Criterion for Recognizing a Government: Towards the Emergence of a Regional Customary Rule in the Americas? A Reply to Professor Erika de Wet

Part of: Recognition of Governments and Customary International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vasiliki Saranti
Vasiliki Saranti*
Affiliation:
Hellenic Military Academy, National Police Academy, Panteion University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Recognition of Governments and Customary International Law
Information
AJIL Unbound , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 233 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

References

1 de Wet, Erika, From Free Town to Cairo via Kiev: The Unpredictable Road of Democratic Legitimacy in Governmental Recognition, 108 AJIL Unbound 201 (2015)Google Scholar.

2 Pact of the League of Arab States, Mar. 22, 1945, 70 UNTS 237.

3 Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion, 1975 ICJ REP. 61 (Oct. 16).

4 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 ICJ REP. 14 (June 27).

5 Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion, para. 94, 1975 ICJ REP. 61 (Oct. 16).

6 GA Res. A/51/761 (Dec. 20, 1996).

7 Treaty on European Union, art. VII, Feb. 7, 1992, 1992 O.J. 326.

8 African Union [AU], African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, Jan. 30, 2007.

9 Economic Community of West African States [ECOWAS], Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, ECOWAS Doc. A/SP1/12/01 (Dec. 21, 2001).

10 SC Res. 940 (July 31, 1994).

11 SC Res. 1132 (Oct. 8, 1997).

12 Post-Election Crisis, United Nations: United Nations Operation in Cote D’ivoire [UNOCI].

13 Organization of American States [OAS], Representative Democracy, AG/Res. 1080 (XXI-O/91) (June 5, 1991).

14 OAS, Protocol of Amendments to the Charter of the OAS, “Protocol of Washington”, A-56 (Dec. 14, 1992).

15 OAS, Inter-American Democratic Charter, Sept. 11, 2001.

16 Interpretation of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (Art. 64 American Convention on Human Rights), Advisory Opinion OC-10/89, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) paras. 43, 45 (July 14, 1989).

17 OAS, Annual Report of the Inter-American Juridical Committee to the General Assembly, OAS/Ser.Q/VI.32CJI/doc.79/01 (Aug. 24, 2001).

18 Id. at para. 40.

19 Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (2d ed. 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Rudy, Timothy D., A Quick Look at the Inter-American Democratic Charter of the OAS: What is it and is it “Legal”?, 33 Syracuse J. Int’l L. & Com. 237 (2005)Google Scholar.

21 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 ICJ Rep. 14 (June 27).

22 Id. at para. 188.

23 Id. at para. 192.

24 Asylum Case (Colom. v. Peru), 1950 ICJ Rep. 7 (Nov. 20).

25 Id.

26 OAS, Protocol of Amendments to the Charter of the OAS, “Protocol of Washington”, A-56 (Dec. 14, 1992).