Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:41:56.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Custom and Treaties as Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy

Part of: Agora: The End of Treaties?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bart M. J. Szewczyk
Bart M. J. Szewczyk*
Affiliation:
Columbia Law School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As treaties decline, customary international law can be an important mechanism of international cooperation over the medium term. There are increasingly fewer treaties ratified by the United States, with a record-low number of five in 2009–2012, and fewer multilateral treaties adopted worldwide. Yet, the demand for global rules and standards has not abated. Thus, for many international questions where treaties are not available as a source of new rules, customary international law may serve as an interchangeable instrument of national policy.

Type
Agora: The End of Treaties?
Information
AJIL Unbound , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 41 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

References

1 Search Treaties through Thomas, The Library of Congress Google Scholar

2 Treaties in Force, U.S. Dep’t of State Google Scholar.

3 McDougal, Myres S. & Lans, Asher, Treaties and Congressional-Executive or Presidential Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy: II, 54 Yale L.J. 534 (1945)Google Scholar.

4 Lecture on the Causes of Uncertainty and Volatility in International Law, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law (2014)Google Scholar.

5 Bederman, David J., Custom as a Source of Law (2010)Google Scholar.

6 Nat’l Intelligence Council, Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds (2012)Google Scholar.

7 Bremmer, Ian, Every Nation for Itself: What Happens When No One Leads the World (2012)Google Scholar.

8 Charles A.|Kupchan, No One’s World: the West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn (2012)Google Scholar.

9 Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Presidential Leadership and the Creation of the American Era (2013)Google Scholar.

10 Koh, Harold Hongju, Address: Twenty-First-Century International Lawmaking, 101 Geo. L. J. Online 1 (2012)Google Scholar.

11 Bradley, Curtis A. & Morrison, Trevor W., Presidential Power, Historical Practice, and Legal Constraint, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 1097 (2013)Google Scholar.

12 Id.

13 Szewczyk, Bart. M.J., Variable Multipolarity and UN Security Council Reform, 53 Harv. Int’l L. J. (2012)Google Scholar.

14 See Bederman, supra note 5.

15 Summary Records of the Second Session June 5-June 29 1950, Y.B. Int’l L. Comm’n 1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1950.

16 Id.

17 Id.

18 Szewczyk, Bart. M.J., Customary International Law and Statutory Interpretation: An Empirical Analysis of Federal Court Decisions, 82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1118 (2014)Google Scholar.

19 Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (5th ed. 1988)Google Scholar.

20 See Summary Records of the Second Session June5-June 29 1950, supra note 15.

21 Sovereignty Over Pedra Brance/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malay. v. Sing.), Judgment, 2008 ICJ Rep 12 (May 23).

22 North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Ger. v. Den.; Ger. v. Neth.), Judgment,.1969 ICJ Rep. 3 (Feb. 20).

23 Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, UN GAOR Supp. No. 10, UN Doc. A/67/10 (2012).

24 See Bederman, supra note 5.

25 Id.

26 Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (2d ed. 1993)Google Scholar.

27 Amar, Akhil Reed, American’s Unwritten Constitution (2012)Google Scholar.

28 D’amato, Anthony A., The Concept of Custom in International Law (1971)Google Scholar.

29 Id.

30 See Summary Records of the Second Session June5-June 29 1950, supra note 15.

31 Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law, (Tucker, Robert W. ed. 2d ed. 1966)Google Scholar.