Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:30:17.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cuban Reservations and the Revision of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Manley O. Hudson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 1932 , pp. 590 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the minutes of the Conference in League of Nations Document, C.514.M.173.1929. V. p. 9.

2 League of Nations Document, C.492.M.156.1929.V. See also 1 Hudson, International Legislation, p. 582.

3 League of Nations Document, C.L.194(a).1930.V. For the writer’s analysis of these reasons, see this Journal, Vol. 25 (1931), p. 19.

4 League of Nations Official Journal, 1930, p. 1313.

5 League of Nations Document, C.L.4.1931.V.

6 League of Nations Official Journal, 1927, p. 800.

7 League of Nations Document, A.81.1931.V.

8 M. Pilotti, Rapporteur of the First Committee, made the following statement to the Assembly on September 25, 1930: “The First Committee considered that, if the Protocol of September 14th, 1929, enters into force at some future date, it would have no effect upon the term of office of judges elected at the present Assembly.

“The Committee also considered the difficulties which might arise, after the entry into force of the Protocol, from the application of the new rules concerning disabilities laid down in Articles 16 and 17 of the revised Statute annexed to the said Protocol. Despite some divergence of view as to the substance of the question, the Committee recognised that the last paragraph of these articles, and in certain circumstances Article 18, empower the Court to give a decision in respect of any difficulties that might arise.” Records of the Eleventh Assembly, League of Nations Official Journal, Special Supplement No. 84, p. 131.

9 League of Nations Document, A.81.1931.V.

10 For an English translation, see U. S. Bulletin of Treaty Information, No. 29, p. 2.

11 League of Nations Document, C.L.33.1932.V.

12 League of Nations Document, C.L.50.1932.V.

13 Records of the Eleventh Assembly, League of Nations Official Journal, Special Supplement No. 84, p. 131.