Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:29:39.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Could the Colombian Peace Accord Trigger an ICC Investigation on Colombia?

Part of: Colombian Peace Talks and International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nelson Camilo Sanchez Leon
Nelson Camilo Sanchez Leon*
Affiliation:
National University of Colombia, Center for the Study of the Law, Justice and Society—Dejusticia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is very unlikely—if not impossible—that a guerrilla movement would voluntarily agree to demobilize if the cost is that a majority of its members will receive long prison sentences. For this reason, any peace accord between the Colombian government and the Farc (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) Marxist guerilla will not be able to adapt to a strict interpretation of the duty to investigate, judge, and penalize. The challenge in this context is to incentivize demobilization while fulfilling the accountability standards of criminal law.

Type
Symposium on the Colombian Peace Talks and International Law
Information
AJIL Unbound , Volume 110 , 2016 , pp. 172 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

References

1 Sandoval, Clara, Facing the justice dilemma in Colombia, Justice Info (June 5, 2015 Google Scholar).

2 Rodrigo Uprimmy & Nelson Camilo Sánchez, The ICC and negotiated peace: reflections from Colombia, Opendemocracy (Feb. 11, 2015).

3 Registro Único De Víctimas.

4 El Congreso de Colombia, Por Medio Del Cual se Establecen Instrumentos Jurídicos de Justicia Transicional en el Marco del Artículo 22 de la Constitución Política y se Dictan Otras Disposiciones, Acto Legislativo No. 01, Jul 31, 2012.

5 Transitional Justice Institute, The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability (2013).

6 Mallinder, Louise, The End of Amnesty or Regional Overreach? Interpreting the Erosion of South America’s Amnesty Laws, 65 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 645 (2016)Google Scholar.

7 Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crime Cases (Bergsmo, Morten ed., 2d ed. 2010)Google Scholar.

8 FARC-EP: Una mirada distinta en torno a la justicia transicional, La Pluma (Jan 28, 2015, 12:48 AM).

9 Brodzinsky, Sibylla, Colombia’s government and Farc rebels reach agreement in step to end civil war, The Guardian (Dec. 15, 2015, 7:01 PM)Google Scholar.

10 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, 2187 UNTS 38544.

11 Uprimny, Rodrigo, ¿Cartas bombas?, El Espectador (Aug. 24, 2013, 11:00 PM)Google Scholar.

12 James Stewart, Transitional Justice in Colombia and the Role of the International Criminal Court (May 13, 2015).

13 Seils, Paul, Squaring Colombia’s Circle, ICTJ Briefing (June 2015)Google Scholar.

14 Colombia: Agreeing to Impunity, Human Rights Watch (Dec. 22, 2015, 8:36 AM).

15 Office of the Prosecutor, Statement of Icc Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, on the conclusion of the peace negotiations between the Government of Colombia and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—People’s Army, International Criminal Court (Sept. 1, 2016).

16 Security Council reiterates commitment to Colombian peace process, Un News Centre (Aug. 26, 2016).