No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
The first sentence of Professor Murase’s article “The Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Japan’s Treaty Practice During the Period 1854-1905” which appeared in the April issue of the Journal is incorrect. He asserts that “[i]t can be said today that a unilateral most-favored-nation (MFN) clause is only of historical significance.” However, even today, Japan lives under the threat of a unilateral unconditional most-favored-nation clause.
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1976
References
1 70 AJIL 273(1976).
2 3 UST 3170, 3190.