Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:16:07.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correspondence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first sentence of Professor Murase’s article “The Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Japan’s Treaty Practice During the Period 1854-1905” which appeared in the April issue of the Journal is incorrect. He asserts that “[i]t can be said today that a unilateral most-favored-nation (MFN) clause is only of historical significance.” However, even today, Japan lives under the threat of a unilateral unconditional most-favored-nation clause.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1976

References

1 70 AJIL 273(1976).

2 3 UST 3170, 3190.