Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T15:04:00.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Marian Nash Leich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 611 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The suggested amendments were intended (1) to clarify the authority of customs authorities to seize an item already admitted upon the basis of apparently satisfactory evidence, should it later be ascertained that the item would not have been admitted, had the correct facts been known; and (2) to require a setting out of “facts,” rather than “belief,” as a basis for certain required statements.

2 Dept. of State File No. P82 0042–2194.

1 18 Weekly Comp. of Pres. Doc. 349–50 (March 29, 1982), 128 Cong. Rec. S2513 (daily ed. March 22, 1982). See also 76 AJIL 181 (1982).