No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
1 Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 105 AJIL 568, 610 (2011)Google Scholar.
2 John M. Broder & Clifford Kraus, State Dept. Backs Canadian Pipeline, N.Y. Times, Aug. 27, 2011, at Al; Juliet Eilperin, Plan for Canada-to-Texas Pipeline Moves Forward, Wash. Post, Aug. 27, 2011, at A2.
3 Editorial, Wrong Pipeline, Wrong Assessment, N.Y. Times, July 21, 2011, at A22.
4 Editorial, Pipeline Politics, Wash. Post, Aug. 14, 2011, at A16.
5 Juliet Eilperin, Oil Pipeline a Political Problem for Obama, Wash. Post, Oct. 8, 2011, at A3; Juliet Eilperin & Steven Mufson, A Pipeline Predicament for Obama, Wash. Post, Oct. 17, 2011, at Al.
6 John M. Broder, WatchdogAnnounces Special Inquiry on Contested Pipeline, N.Y. Times, Nov. 8, 2011, at Al 2; Steven Mufson, Pipeline Permitting Process Will Be Reviewed, Wash. Post, Nov. 8, 2011, at A4.
7 Juliet Eilperin, Pipeline Route May Get Another Look from U.S., Wash. Post, Nov. 10, 2011, at A20; John M. Broder & Dan Frosch, U.S. Review Expected to Deky Oil Pipeline Past the Election, N.Y. Times, Nov. 11, 2011, at Al; Juliet Eilperin, Administration Dehys Decision on Oil Pipeline, Wash. Post, Nov. 11, 2011, at Al.
8 John M. Broder & Dan Frosch, Politics Stamps Out Oil Sands Pipeline, Yet It Seems Likely to Endure, N.Y. Times, Dec. 24, 2011, at A12; John M. Broder & Dan Frosch, Proposed Oil Pipeline Is Bogged Down by Politics, N.Y. Times, Jan. 19, 2012, at AIO; Editorial, A Good Call on the Pipeline, N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 2011, at A20.
9 U.S. Dep’t of State Press Release No. 2012/070, Denial of the Keystone XL Pipeline Application (Jan. 18, 2012), at http://www.state.gOv/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/01/18l473.htm.