No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Commission and Advisory Committee on International Rules of Judicial Procedure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955
References
1 Briggs, A., Cartas Rogatorias Internationaes 337 (1913)Google Scholar.
2 Act of March 2, 1855, 10 Stat. 630.
3 33 A.J.I.L. Supp. 11–166 (1939).
4 League of Nations Doc. A.15.1928.V.; 22 A.J.I.L. Spec. Supp. 46 (1928).
5 See Blackmer v. U. S., 284 U. S. 421 (1932).
6 Proceedings, American Society of International Law, 1951, p. 188.
7 See Jones, H. L., “International Judicial Assistance: Procedural Chaos and a Program for Reform,” 62 Yale L. J. 615 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 E.g., 4 Répertoire de Droit International Privé 139 (1929); 4 Travers, Le Droit Pénal International 201 (1921).
9 T.I.A.S. No. 2846; 48 A.J.I.L. Supp. 83 (1954).
10 T.I.A.S. No. 2848.
11 See Keedy, “The Preliminary Investigation of Crime in France,” 88 U. of Penn. L.R. 692 et seq., and 931–933 (1940).
12 Inter-American Juridical Committee, Report on Uniformity of Legislation in International Cooperation in Judicial Procedures, 20 (Mimeo.l952). For a comment on this report, see Jones, H. L., “International Judicial Assistance,” 2 Am. J.Comp. L. 365 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Quaere, whether it would he considered a violation of Art. 271 of the Swiss Penal Code (the Foreign Official Acts Statute).
14 Matter of Romero, 56 Misc. 319, 107 N.Y. Supp. 621 (Sup.Ct. 1907); re Letters Rogatory out of the First Civil Court of the City of Mexico, 261 Fed. 652(S.D.N.Y. 1919).
15 The reporters of the Harvard Draft listed 123 of “the more important” agreements. Appendix I, 33 A.J.I.L. Supp. 119 (1939).