Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:35:39.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cerruti Arbitrations1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

See Bureau’s Conflit Italo-Colombien (Affaire Cerruti), 1899 (strongly Colombian); Darras’ Certains Dangers de l’arbitrage international in the Revue générale de droit International Public, for 1899, pp. 533-552; Hagerup’s Affaire Cerruti — Sentence Arbitrate de 6 Juillet 1911, ibid, 1912, pp. 268-274.

References

2 See the text of the convention, Supplement p. 238.

3 See Judicial Decisions, this Journal, p. 1003.

4 For text of this instrument see Judicial Decisions, this Journal, p. 1015. For a scathing criticism of the award, see Pierantoni’s “Nullité d’un arbitrage international “in the Revue de droit international et de législation comparée for 1898, Vol. XXX, pp. 445 et seq.

5 See the correspondence on this point in Foreign Relations of the United States (1898), pp. 251-273.

6 Mr. Sherman to Señor Rengifo, For. Rel. of the U. S. 1898, p. 251.

7 See Señor Rengifo’s notes to Messrs, Olney and Sherman, dated respectively, Washington, March 3, May 1, 1897, in For. Rel. of U. S. (1898), pp. 246-249.

8 See correspondence in Bruneau’s Conflit Italo-Colombien, pp. 115-125.