Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:16:42.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case of the Irish Republic’s Funds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edwin D. Dickinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1927 , pp. 747 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 40 Geo. Il l , c. 67.

2 2 The text of the deed is in [1926] Ir. Rep. 537

3 10 & 11 Geo. V, c. 67.

4 12 Geo. V, c. 4.

5 Fogarty and Others v. O’Donoghue and Others, [1926] Ir. Rep. 531.

6 Fogarty and Others v. O’Donoghue and Others, [1926] Ir. Rep. 549.

7 Ibid., 565.

8 1 Sim. N. S. 301.

9 2 H.& M. 559.

10 L. R. 8 Eq. 69.

11 38 Ch. D. 348.

12 [1926] Ir. Rep. 531, 568.

13 Irish Free State v. Guaranty Safe Deposit Co., 126 Misc. Rep. 269; 212 N. Y. Supp. 42.

14 See French Republics. Inland Navigation Co., 263 Fed. 410. Cf. Kingdom of Norway v.Federal Sugar Refining Co., 286 Fed. 188.

15 Irish Free State v. Guaranty Safe Deposit Co., 127 Misc. Rep. 86; 215 N. Y. Supp. 255.

16 222 N. Y. Supp. 182, 194, 188.

17 Ibid., 195.

18 222 N. Y. Supp. 197.

19 Irish Free State v. Guaranty Safe Deposit Co. (1927), 222 N. Y. Supp. 182.

20 See In re Great Berlin Steamboat Co., 26 Ch. D. 616. Cf. Scott, Cases on Trusts, 366 n.

21 See De Wiitz v. Hendricks, 9 Moo. 586, 2 Bing. 314; Habershon v. Vardon, 4 De G. and Sm. 467; Kennett v. Chambers, 14 How. 38; Cobbett, Cases, 3d ed., II, 366; 22 Mich. L. Rev. 118.

22 See Luther v. Sagor & Co., [1921] 3 K. B. 532; Oetjen v. Central Leather Co., 246 U. S.297; Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of Mexico, 5 F. (2d) 659.

23 [1926] Ir. Rep. 531, 574.

24 Cardozo, J., in Sokoloff v. National City Bank, 239 N. Y. 158, 165. See also Russian Reinsurance Co. t. Stoddard, 240 N. Y. 149, 163.

25 The writer has learned, since the above comment went to press, that no appeal has been taken in the case and that the judgment directing distribution of the funds among the subscribers is to be carried out.