Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-96rnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:21:21.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Banning of Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: The U.N. Rôle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

George Bunn
George Bunn*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin; U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and Alternate Representative, Geneva Disarmament Conference
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Panel: The United Nations and Disarmament
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 64 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Sixty-Fourth Annual Meeting held at New York, N.Y. April 24-26, 1970 , September 1970 , pp. 194 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A more detailed exposition, with appropriate citation of authority, appears in Bunn, , “Banning Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree?”, 69 Wis. Law Rev. 375 (1969)Google Scholar.

2 To add to the difficulty, the French text substitutes “similar” (“gaz asphyxiantes, toxiques ou similaires”) for the “other” of the English text. Yet the French interpret the Protocol as banning tear gas.

3 The United States has recently withdrawn one defoliant from use there.