No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Arms Embargo and Neutrality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000222410/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000222410a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1933
References
1 Some of the legal consequences of such a boycott, which the proponents of an arms embargo against a single belligerent may not adequately have considered, are set out by Messrs. Hyde, and Wehle, in their article, “The Boycott in Foreign Affairs, ” this Journal, Vol. 27 (1933), p. 1. Google Scholar
2 Moore, John Bassett “ Candor and Common Sense, ” Address before Bar Association of New York, Dec. 4, 1930, p. 20. Google Scholar
3 The Report of the Committee of Nineteen does not characterize Japan as an “ aggressor ” ; it is said that this omission was intentional, to prevent the sanctions of Art. 16 from coming into force.