Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:13:33.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Armement Deppe, S. A. v. United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 337 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Court of Appeals defined a dual-rate contract as “ … one under which shippers, by agreement, tender all or any fixed portion of their cargo destined for certain designated American ports to conference carriers, as a result of which they pay a lower rate for the shipping of commodities than other shippers.” 399 F.2d 794 at 796. (Footnotes by the court omitted.)

2 The court noted that this amendment followed the decision of the Supreme Court that dual-rate contracts violated the 1916 Act. Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U. S. 481 (1958).

3 399 F.2d 794 at 798. Emphasis by the court.

4 Ibid. 798-799.