No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Validity of Foreign Confiscations: An Addendum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1962
References
1 Baade, , “Indonesian Nationalization Measures Before Foreign Courts—A Reply,” 54 A.J.I.L. 801, 830 (1960)Google Scholar.
2 Domke, , “Foreign Nationalizations,” 55 A.J.I.L. 585, esp. 611–615 (1961)Google Scholar; Wortley, “Indonesian Nationalization Measures—An Intervention,” ibid. 680; Mann, “ Völkerrechtswidrige Enteignungen vor nationalen Gerichten,” 1961 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 705, 708, note 40, where our article cited in the preceding footnote is called “kenntnisreich(..), aber unbefriedigend(..);” this compliment is returned herewith. For equally eminent authority in support of our position, see Raape, Internationales Privatrecht 662–663 (5th ed., 1961); Kegel in 5 Soergel, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 618–619, 633 (9th ed., 1961).
3 An appeal is currently pending in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 P. Supp. 375 (1961), 55 A.J.I.L. 741 (1961). See especially Palk, “Toward a Theory of the Participation of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order: A Critique of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino,” 16 Rutgers Law Rev. 1 (1962); also Coerper, “The Act of State Doctrine in the Light of the Sabbatino Case,” 56 A.J.I.L. 143 (1962), and Note, 110 U. of Pa. Law Rev. 122 (1961).
4 5 U. S. Foreign Relations 1940 at 976–1029. See, generally, Wortley, , “The Mexican Oil Dispute, 1938–1946,” 43 Grotius Society Transactions 15 (1957)Google Scholar.
5 See Baade, loc. cit. note 1 above, at 809–810.
6 Now published in full in 5 U. S. Foreign Relations 1940 at 1009–1013; quotation from p. 1010. See also John Bassett Moore’s memorandum of March 20, 1940, ibid, at 1006–1007.
7 Baade, loc. cit. note 1 above, at 810.
8 See Wortley, loc. cit. note 2 above, at 681.
9 5 U. S. Foreign Relations 1940 at 982–984, 984–986, 988–989, 990–994, 994–996.
10 Ibid. 989–990, 996–997, 1013–1014.
11 Ibid. 994–996, 996–997.
12 Ibid. 994, 995.
13 Memorandum accompanying the note to Switzerland of Jan. 11, 1957, 36 Dept. of State Bulletin 350, 357 (1957).
14 Baade, loc. cit. note 1 above, at 810–811.
15 Rich v. Naviera Vacuba, S. A., 197 F. Supp. 710 (E. D. Va., 1961), aff’d per curiam, 295 F. 2d 24 (4th Cir., 1961), reprinted below, p. 550.
16 Rabinowitz, , “Immunity of State-Owned Ships and Barratry,” 1962 Journal of Business Law 89 Google Scholar.
17 197 F. Supp. 710 at 724.
18 Extracts from the memorandum are reprinted in Rabinowitz, loc. cit. note 16 above, at 92.
19 Such a development seems not unlikely; see Pons v. Republic of Cuba, 294 F. 2d 925 (App. D..C, 1961), certiorari denied, 368 U. S. 960 (1962).
20 See Baade, loc. cit. note 1 above, at 806–807; Urbanek, “Die Unrechtsfolgen bei einem völkerrechtsverletzenden nationalen Urteil; seine Behandlung durch internationale Gerichte,” 11 Österreichische Zeitsehrift für Öffentliches Recht 70 (1961). Apart from some brief discussions of the nullity of arbitral awards, no English-language materials on this subject could be discovered.