Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:04:08.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Unilateral Termination of Treaties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

L. H. Woolsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1926 , pp. 346 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pierre Crabites, Amer. Bar Assoc. Journal, Vol. XI, p. 485.

2 Edgar Turlington, this Journal , Vol. 18, p. 699.

3 The Turkish delegation was supported also by the fact that the so-called Turkish National Pact, which had been approved by the Parliament at Constantinople, January 28, 1920, and was in the nature of a constitutional law, contained a declaration that the restrictions imposed upon Turkey by the capitulations could no longer be tolerated. The Turkish delegation stated that their government had declared before the convening of the Lausanne Conference that this pact embodied the conditions upon which alone a durable peace could be made.

4 Fodéré, Pradier, Vol. II, p. 264, 1911.Google Scholar

5 Turkey No. 1, 1923, Lausanne Conference on Near Eastern Affairs, pp. 478-479.

6 Lausanne Conference, H. M. Stationery Office, Cmd. 1814, p. 465 et seq.

7 Willoughby, , China at the Conference, pp. 55-79.Google Scholar

8 Id., 116.

9 Id., pp. 113-115.